Anonymous
Domino 2.0 Rich Internet Applications with IBM Lotus Notes/Domino
You are here: Today » Finding information on BlogSphere
« Using a QueryOpen agent to render HTML pages
Setting up a blog with BlogSphere »

Finding information on BlogSphere

Today, I wanted to dive deeper into BlogSphere, to see if I could adapt it to fit my needs for this blog. So I looked around for information:

Unfortunately, the server of www.blogsphere.net and Declan's blog is down for several days now. I hope it will revive soon.

Finding skins for BlogSphere

I found out that BlogSphere uses the same HTML structure and CSS classes as another well known blog publishing platform: Movable Type. How to import a Movable Type skin and where to find these can be found on Captain Oblivious: 'Importing a New Skin into BlogSphere V3'. The default skin that comes with BlogSphere, Vicksburg, is a Movable Type skin. Vicksburg exists a number of color variations.

When importing a Movable Type skin, I noticed that special blocks like the Calendar are not skinned because their classNames are different. I have the feeling however that it would take just a small effort to make a Movable Type to BlogSphere skin converter.

Creating a new skin for BlogSphere

Most of us bloggers will evidently want to create our own skin. Going along with Movable Type was a superb move indeed: there is an very nice online
Movable Type Style Generator that will help you a lot.

Comparing BlogSphere with the IBM Blog template

After setting up a second test blog with the blog template that ships with the Domino 7 server, it didn't take me long to select the winner. For me, and I take that as a very personal judgement, it clearly is BlogSphere:

What next?

Both BlogSphere and the IBM Blog template use the same remarkable technique: they have almost empty forms, just a rich text field and a bunch of CGI variables. All the HTML rendering is done on the fly with QueryOpen agents. Is this a new trend? Should we consider going in that direction for all web development with Domino? I'll get back on this in my next post.

Star rating

0%

Comments

  1. 05/07/2007 15:32:56, Jan Schulz

    Just one question: why is using relative links "bad"? I've developed a DB, which uses relative links (without base href) annd it works great: the pages are used via a /web/ view and css is in ../css/something.css (and so on for js).

    Hardcoded absolute links were a nightmare: we are having multiple DBs from the template and always configuring the path would be ...bad :-)

    So, what are your bad experiences?

  2. 05/07/2007 19:57:42, Michel Van der Meiren

    It is just a rule I established in my team: no relative links. Before this rule we had enormous problems with design companies making Flash files that used nothing but relative paths to include additional movies, images and XML. There was no way we could integrate them in our WCMS where we could not reproduce the same folder structure because all the binary files needed to be published in one /Images/ directory.

  3. 05/07/2007 20:36:33, Jan Schulz

    Ok, seems that my 'only DB content' strategy works then without absolute links.

    Thanks anyway, I haven't thought about such content. Thanks $Deity, we don't have that :-)

  4. 16/07/2007 15:54:01, Pankaj Sharma

    I have been trying to use Blogsphere but I am not able to see any pages. Even after configuring as mentioned in the site. The site url simply does not display any pages. Shows just blank page and no errors...

    Can you help please ...

    While using IBM blog is easy.

To add a comment, log in or register as new user. It's free and safe.